Cherry Tomato

"Cherry Tomato" depicts the poverty-stricken life of an old man and his granddaughter in a realistic way that evokes a strong sense of sympathy. But the ultimate emotion the film triggers is, for better or worse, helplessness.

The debut feature by former television producer Jeong Yeong-bae wastes no time highlighting the key theme: poverty. Park-gu (played by veteran actor Sin Goo) is barely scraping by with his granddaughter Da-seong (Kim Hyang-ki), and their life is unbearably miserable.

Living in a shabby single-room rented house, they do not have enough money to feed themselves. Park-gu works as a porter for a shopping mall in Seoul but he soon finds himself kicked out of the place. In his 70s, Park-gu tries to survive by collecting papers and recyclable stuffs on the street, but the money he earns is always too small to buy a decent meal.

His granddaughter, 6, seems mature for her age, possibly due to her trouble-laden life. After her mother left away years ago and her father was put behind bars, she has been raised by her foul-mouthed grandfather. What is remarkable -- and emotional -- is that Da-seong knows her friends happily go to kindergarten and lead a normal life that is so different from hers, but she does not complain to her grandfather or anybody else.

She feels always hungry, but hunger is not the only problem. Suffering a form of congenital corneal opacity and deprived of specially designed glasses, she frequently stumbles and falls flat on the ground. Yet she does not cry that much.

The trouble doubles when her father Chun-sam (Kim Yeong-ho) abruptly returns home. Da-seong, however, gets only a small pot of cherry tomatoes when her father steals the tiny sum of money her grandfather has so far saved and runs away.

As if testing the sympathy level of audiences, director Chung stacks up another layer of challenge for Park-gu and Da-seong. One day, a redevelopment company, flanked by hired goons, attack the villagers to push ahead with an apartment construction project.

In Korea, this type of land redevelopment project generates highly lucrative profits for the wealthy real estate businessmen, but the old villagers are usually forced to leave their houses with nominal compensation. Many of them often end up living on the streets.

The confrontation between villagers and the hired thugs destroys Park-gu's bicycle-drawn cart, his sole tool for making money. Confronted with this shattering development, Park-gu decides to face up to the president of the construction company, Kap-su (Kim Byeong-choon), but through a chain of unexpected events he and his granddaughter sneak into Kap-su's luxurious mansion while the owner is away on a trip. Hiding inside the house, Kap-sun and Da-seong enjoy nibbling at expensive cookies and other delicacies.

From this point on, the movie constantly contrasts the hunger of Kap-su and Da-seong with the luxury imposed on Kap-su's dog. It turns out that this wealthy man cares so much about his pet, he never spares money for serving only high-quality food to the dog. Every day, a package of meat is delivered to the house, and Kap-su's household manger Dong-hun (Choi Dong-gyun) has to feed the dog on time.

But Dong-hun does not respect his boss. In fact, he hates him so much so that he develops a scheme for revenge: poisoning the meat bowl for the dog at a slow pace in an attempt to break Kap-su's heart.

What Dong-hun fails to forecast is that the meat bowl might be consumed by somebody else -- people who are hungry enough to touch their hands on that tantalizingly well cooked meat.

By Yang Sung-jin

Sebuah filem yang menyayat hati. Benar-benar menggambarkan senario kehidupan sekarang. Mereka yang kaya bertambah kaya, dan mereka yang miskin bertambah miskin. Kemanakah hilangnya nilai kemanusiaan? Mereka yang kaya tetap memandang ke langit, menyombongkan diri. Sesungguhnya, mereka tertipu dan terkeliru dengan apa yang mereka miliki.

Di Penang ini sendiri, apabila tiba pasar malam tiap hujung minggu, pasti ramai pengemis dalam kalangan warga tua yang mengemis di tepi jalan. Aku yang miskin ini (kiranya bolehlah dikatakan bertaraf "orang yang wajib menerima zakat fitrah") tidak mampu memberi sedekah kepada setiap pengemis yang berada di pasar malam. Maka, setiap kali melintas di hadapan pengemis-pengemis yang tidak dapat aku berikan sedekah ini, menyebabkan aku takut. Takut jika sekiranya hati aku terdidik untuk bersikap keras hati melihat kesusahan orang lain. Bukan tidak mahu, tapi tidak mampu. Fenomena ini benar-benar meruntun jiwa raga. Inikah sebenarnya buah tangan "kemajuan" yang dicanang-canangkan? Bermula dari awal merdeka, bermacam pelan dirangka dan fokus utamanya ialah menghapuskan kemiskinan. Namun, isu kemiskinan ini tidak ada kesudahannya. Di mana silapnya?